Casio DW5600 vs A168WA

Gear Review

Comparing Casio Digital Wristwatches: DW5600 vs. A168

A battle of value, durability, and daily wearability

$65

Combined Cost

2

Models

+/-20

Accuracy (sec/mo)

Section I

Comparison Overview

Casio digital wristwatches have become famous for offering exceptional value. It can be challenging to find alternatives that match their quality at such low price points. The G-Shock DW5600 and vintage A168 are excellent examples of their respective model lines, available for around $45 and $20, respectively. It’s this affordability that makes these watches so attractive compared to their high-quality features.

 

When comparing watches, you should consider five criteria:

• →Features — Functional depth of the watch.
• →Accuracy — Timekeeping precision over time.
• →Reliability / Durability — Resistance to environmental factors.
• →Wearability — Physical comfort and ergonomic feel.
• →Aesthetics — Visual design and style.

I. Features — DW5600 Wins

Digital watches have a significant advantage over analog watches when it comes to features. Analog watches require space on the dial for each feature, which can be inherently difficult due to limited real estate. In contrast, digital watches can cycle through multiple features using the same display. By pressing the mode button, either Casio watch can cycle through 4-5 screens, each representing a different feature.

• →A168 Features — Time, Day of Week, Day of Month, Alarm (Single), Hourly Chime, Stopwatch, LED Backlight.
• →DW5600 Features — Everything A168 has, plus: Calendar Month, Leap Year Automatic Adjustment, Countdown Timer, Alarms (Multiple).

The DW5600 is the clear winner for feature-rich performance, covering all the bases of the A168 plus specialized timing tools.

II. Accuracy — Tie

The G-Shock DW5600 is probably more accurate, but both watches have shown to be very close. Most digital watches from Casio are accurate within +/- 20 seconds per month.

III. Reliability / Durability — DW5600

The G-Shock is designed for durability and is the epitome of what we consider a "beater" watch. It can withstand rough conditions—swimming, diving, mountain climbing—without issue. The only potential weak spot in most G-Shocks is their resin band and case cover, which can become brittle and crack with frequent sunlight exposure. The A168 is also durable, but given its low price point, you wouldn't worry too much if it gets damaged. The A168 features a steel band, which could last longer than the resin of the DW5600.

IV. Wearability — A168 Wins

Wearability is subjective, and experiences can vary. Some people find the A168's wristband pulls hair, but I find it more comfortable for long-term wear compared to the G-Shock.

Feature	A168	DW5600
Weight	< 50g	Heavier
Band Material	Steel	Resin
Comfort	Supple/Breathable	Rigid/Itchy when wet

The A168's metal construction conducts heat well, making it ideal for warmer climates and office environments.

V. Aesthetics — DW5600, Slightly

Aesthetics are highly subjective, with personal tastes varying widely. I appreciate the G-Shock's durable design and how the DW5600 looks on my wrist. The A168 appears more delicate but has its own charm as a no-nonsense watch for those who prefer simplicity.

   

By the numbers, the DW5600 technically wins, but the ideal move is to own both: the A168 for the office and the DW5600 for the weekend.