Casio DW5600 vs A168WA

Comparing Casio Digital Wristwatches: DW5600 vs. A168

Casio digital wristwatches have become famous for offering exceptional value. It can be challenging to find alternatives that match their quality at such low price points. The G-Shock DW5600 and vintage A168 are excellent examples of their respective model lines, available for around $45 and $20, respectively. It’s this affordability that makes these watches so attractive compared to their high-quality features.

When comparing watches, you should consider five criteria:

• Features
• Accuracy
• Reliability / Durability
• Wearability
• Aesthetics

I. Features - DW5600 Wins

Digital watches have a significant advantage over analog watches when it comes to features. Analog watches require space on the dial for each feature, which can be inherently difficult due to limited real estate. In contrast, digital watches can cycle through multiple features using the same display. By pressing the mode button, either Casio watch can cycle through 4-5 screens, each representing a different feature.

A168 Features:

• Time
• Day of Week
• Day of Month
• Alarm (Single)
• Hourly Chime
• Stopwatch
• LED Backlight

DW5600 Features:

• Everything A168 has, plus:
  • Calendar Month
  • Leap Year Automatic Adjustment
  • Countdown Timer
  • Alarms (Multiple)

From a simple count of features, the DW5600 wins, as it can do everything the A168 can and more.

II. Accuracy - Tie

The G-Shock DW5600 is probably more accurate, but both watches have shown to be very close. Most digital watches from Casio are accurate within +/- 20 seconds per month.

III. Reliability / Durability - DW5600

The G-Shock is designed for durability and is the epitome of what we consider a "beater" watch. It can withstand rough conditions—swimming, diving, mountain climbing—without issue.

The only potential weak spot in most G-Shocks is their resin band and case cover, which can become brittle and crack with frequent sunlight exposure. The A168 is also durable for a "beater" watch, but given its low price point, you wouldn't worry too much if it gets damaged. The A168 features a steel band, which could last longer than the resin of the DW5600, but both watches are generally reliable and durable.

IV. Wearability - A168 Wins

Wearability is subjective, and experiences can vary. Some people find the A168's wristband pulls hair, but I find it more comfortable for long-term wear compared to the G-Shock.

The A168 weighs less than 50 grams and has a metal case back and band, making it more comfortable in warmer climates. The metal conducts heat well, wicking away sweat. Conversely, the G-Shock can become uncomfortable over time due to its semi-rigid band, especially when wet, leading to itching and constant adjustments. I have found that wearing the DW5600 on my right wrist is more comfortable for extended periods, but the A168 can be worn on either wrist with a supple feel.

V. Aesthetics - DW5600, Slightly

Aesthetics are highly subjective, with personal tastes varying widely. I appreciate the G-Shock's durable design and how the DW5600 looks on my wrist. The A168 appears more delicate but has its own charm as a no-nonsense watch for those who prefer simplicity.

Closing

By the numbers, the DW5600 technically "wins." However, given their low price points, unless your job or lifestyle demands a watch designed for extreme environments, you might consider getting both watches to enjoy their unique offerings.

The affordability of basic Casio watches is highly appealing. Personally, I use the A168 as my office and weekday watch while reserving the DW5600 for weekends and outdoor activities. I don’t worry about switching watches unless I'm near water or planning to swim, in which case I remember to bring the DW5600.